Muse Wonder benchmarks: 56 vs Claude Opus 5.5's 58

Meta published benchmarks for Muse Wonder Full and Muse Wonder, scoring 56 and 52 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index versus 58 for Claude Opus 5.5. Wonder Full leads in long agentic tasks (SWE-Marathon 57.5 vs 46.3) but trails in factual knowledge (30 vs 46) and terminal tasks.

DEV Community

Open source

Muse Wonder benchmarks: 56 vs Claude Opus 5.5's 58

Muse Wonder Full scores 56 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Muse Wonder 52
Claude Opus 5.5 leads at 58, Claude Sonnet 5.5 at 56, GPT-6 Astra and Gemini 4 Argon at 53
Wonder Full wins SWE-Marathon (57.5 vs 46.3) and Harvey LAB (13.1 vs 4.2)
Weak spot is factual knowledge: 30 on AA-Omniscience vs 46 for Opus 5.5

#Meta#MuseWonder#Claude#GPT-6

Muse Wonder benchmarks: 56 vs Claude Opus 5.5's 58

Independent benchmarks for Opus 5.5: first place and third on secure code

Gemini 4 Argon vs Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra: same prompts, real bills

Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol: cost per task, not per token

Meta joins enterprise agent race with Muse Wonder